Relectio: Journal of Critical Governance and Legal Reform employs a double-blind peer review process in which the identities of both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to ensure a fair, objective, and unbiased evaluation. Each submitted manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent experts with relevant expertise in the subject area.

The review process evaluates the originality, analytical depth, scholarly contribution, relevance to the journal’s scope, methodological rigor, and overall quality of the manuscript. Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the editor will determine whether the manuscript is accepted, accepted with revisions, requires major or minor revisions, or is rejected.

Authors are given the opportunity to revise their manuscripts in response to the reviewers’ comments and suggestions. Revised manuscripts will be evaluated by the editor and, when necessary, may be returned to the reviewers before a final publication decision is made.